Read it on Medium -
A year ago, we thought we knew what we were building — an AI-powered assistant for businesses. We imagined an intelligent system that would crunch numbers, surface insights, and automate decisions, revolutionizing how companies worked with data. But reality had other plans. What started as a straightforward AI project quickly turned into a lesson in humility. The deeper we went, the more we realized: AI isn’t just about the latest models or big data. It’s about context, human behavior, and trust. It’s about understanding not just what AI can do, but what users will actually let it do.
The Early Misstep: When AI Looked Smarter Than It Was
We built our first version fast. It processed data, analyzed trends, and even gave recommendations. But when we tested it with users, something felt off.
Their reactions weren’t what we expected.
Instead of excitement, we got hesitation. Instead of delight, we got skepticism.
Turns out, people didn’t just want AI that informed them — they wanted AI that understood their business. Raw insights weren’t enough. They wanted context, explanations, and the ability to tweak the AI’s recommendations.
That’s when we hit our first big crossroads.
The Crossroads: AI as a Workflow Engine vs. AI as a Data Analyst
We had to make a choice.
Should our AI act as a workflow engine, making decisions and automating tasks behind the scenes?
Or should it function like a data analyst, surfacing insights and letting humans take action?
Both seemed like valid paths, but neither was enough. A workflow-driven AI risked being too rigid, assuming too much about what users wanted. A data-focused AI risked being too passive, leaving users stuck with the same manual decision-making process — just with better insights.
What we needed was something in between — an AI that could assist, adapt, and act without overstepping.
The Pivot: Embracing Agentic AI
That’s when we pivoted to Agentic AI — a system that doesn’t just suggest but takes action, learns from feedback, and adapts dynamically.
Think of a restaurant. A traditional AI is like a waiter who just hands you the menu and waits for you to order.
An Agentic AI, on the other hand, would remember your preferences, suggest what you might like, and even place the order for you before you ask.
This changed everything. Our AI was no longer just an information provider — it was an active decision-maker. It could take real actions, learn from user input, and adjust its responses over time.
The Reality: AI Is Never Done
Agentic AI sounded great in theory, but in practice, it was messy. We had to rethink how our AI handled uncertainty. We had to build fail-safes, allowing users to override decisions and correct mistakes. We had to earn their trust, one decision at a time. Even today, we’re still building it. We haven’t cracked it fully yet, but every interaction brings new learnings. We’re rolling it out carefully, ensuring that every feature scales in a controlled way before opening it up to all clients.
The Hardest Lesson: Limit Scope, Then Scale
One of the biggest mistakes we almost made was trying to do too much too fast. Unlike traditional software, AI products don’t have a clear finish line. You can’t just “ship” and be done. AI is messy, unpredictable, and constantly evolving. So we learned to ruthlessly prioritize:
Solve one core problem first — don’t spread AI too thin.
Build trust before scaling — AI adoption is psychological, not just technical.
Keep humans in the loop — users need control before they give up decision-making.
By narrowing our focus, we moved faster, learned quicker, and created something users actually loved.
The Big Takeaway: Don’t Rush Into AI — Understand It First
The biggest lesson we learned? AI isn’t just about building — it’s about understanding. Too many teams rush into AI, thinking it’s just another feature. But the truth is, AI changes the entire way users interact with a product. It’s not just about what’s possible — it’s about what’s useful. So if you’re building AI, ask yourself:
Do you deeply understand your users’ workflows?
Have you tested AI in a small, controlled way first?
Are you solving a real problem, or just adding AI for the sake of it?
In 2025, the real challenge isn’t just making AI smarter. It’s making AI trustworthy, intuitive, and indispensable.
Want to dive deeper into how we built AI at Voiro? I recently joined a podcast to talk about our journey, the challenges of AI adoption, and why Agentic AI is the future.
Listen here — https://youtu.be/napPTZkWajA?si=1VzsNHSFMonFistx